3 ms·
It was keynote-worthy for Snow Leopard, with the infamous "0 new features" slide.
by jmchuster 6y ago
It was keynote-worthy for Snow Leopard, with the infamous "0 new features" slide.
- snowwrestler 6y agoSure but Snow Leopard had serious bugs when it launched too. It was only in later dot releases that it got its reputation for stability.
- Wowfunhappy 6y agoI didn't switch to Mac until about halfway through Snow Leopard's lifespan. I'm aware of the big data loss bug—and that's serious for sure—but if you weren't one of the very unlucky few (relatively) to run into it, was 10.6.0 buggy in other ways?
- ianai 6y agoThat’s why I have hopes for them to come back and square up the Mac platform to where it should be for stability and usability. They could have been treating the whole platform as a beta for what they want to make of it after the move to their own silicon for many years now - perhaps even a decade. They’ve been well financed for as long. They also seem to have something like institutional anti-ADHD in so far as they can really only “nail” one product down well at a time.
- pfranz 6y ago"0 new features" was marketing that seems to have worked quite well. I can't remember where, but I swear I remember hearing that later from people at Apple. The major thing is they didn't do a big UI refresh. In Snow Leopard they: finally rewrote Finder in Cocoa, released Quicktime X, shipped a 64bit kernel, released Grand Central Dispatch, released OpenCL. Plus a bunch of smaller updates and tweaks. They dropped included things like printer drivers (which now download on demand) which make the install size smaller.