>Lower fees = lower barrier to entry = crapware Up front fees sure. But how exactly does charging 10% instead of 30% of sales, encourage lower quality software

>Lower fees = lower barrier to entry = crapware Up front fees sure. But how exactly does charging 10% instead of 30% of sales, encourage lower quality software? Where is the cutoff for this? Why 30%? Would 50% encourage even higher quality software? >It's not right to offer an app that doesn't allow subscriptions through the app store, this impacts the product. It's not right? As in it is morally wrong? >So back at square one, you see the problem? People WANT curated app stores. They want ONE app store to buy their apps. They don't want to download 10 app stores for 10 different apps. They can keep buying their apps on 1 curated app store. If the other app stores were so inferior and full of crap, no one would use them, so people such as your self could keep selling apps on the "good" app store. It's a self limiting problem.