>The type of people who want a curated mail experience might just happen to be the type of people who like the curated iPhone experience. >Even if this were tr

>The type of people who want a curated mail experience might just happen to be the type of people who like the curated iPhone experience. >Even if this were true (doubtful), that doesn't mean there is a segment. If you're assuming my scenario is true, then yes it does mean there is a segment. That's what assuming my scenario is true means in this case. > Apple the big bad (meanwhile the company cheated the system, while developers who followed the rules get screwed). If, for example, Apple decides to reduce their fees to 10% going forward are all the developers who've paid 30% in the past screwed? If so you have an odd definition of screwed. >I'm not sure what you're talking about, could you be more clear? 33% really means the 15-30% of revenue that apple takes. I just rounded up to about a third. I thought you were responding to this > I'd wager that the vast majority of people in that segment are on iPhones. And that 33% was the percentage of customers on iPhones. >The fact is the App Store wall entry fee is fair. It's not exorbitant. I and many other people think that 30% is exorbitant. >There are too many remedies for this, and there are far bigger fish to fry in anti-trust than this. Sure, there are always bigger fish to fry. But it's not an either or situation.