>wouldn't stop people from using the curated app store. >Yes you would How? How does "allowing a competing app store, more easily allowing side-loading apps, o

>wouldn't stop people from using the curated app store. >Yes you would How? How does "allowing a competing app store, more easily allowing side-loading apps, or not forcing apps to use apple pay for subscriptions" prevent people from using a curated app store? You just said that it does, but you didn't explain how. >Allowing these others ruins the consumer experience Does it ruin the consumer experience on OSX? >People already pay for that experience when they buy the iPhone. They keep paying for that experience each time they buy an app. And if it's really a superior experience, they'd keep on paying it even if it wasn't required. >There are also other OSes out there. That's laughable. >This is developer sour grapes, mad because he can't use Apple's service for free to make him more money. For a glorified crappy email application. It's so "entitled silicon valley" I can't even take it. Basecamp stands so far apart from silicon valley culture that you almost couldn't make a worse comparison.