You're forming a motte and bailey argument here... inside another motte and bailey argument. Motte #1: doxxing, calls to murder specific individuals Bailey #1

You're forming a motte and bailey argument here... inside another motte and bailey argument. Motte #1: doxxing, calls to murder specific individuals Bailey #1: 'hate speech'. And your bailey itself is a motte and bailey! Motte #2: speech that incites violence or hate against a given group Bailey #2: "All lives matter", "It's ok to be white" banned, "#killallmen", "all white people are racist" Ok. It's always like this. I'd love a pro-censorship advocate to actually advocate what they want instead of endlessly cloaking it in these sorts of smokescreens and sneer labels. If 'hate speech' ever defended all people equally it wouldn't get so much pushback as a concept, but it was always a special protection for groups favored by those in power. Address that.