4 ms·
> I would hope it’s well understood... [that racism is]... a net negative for society. Sure, but there are many racism-adjacent topics that are not so clear cu
by lodi 6y ago
> I would hope it’s well understood... [that racism is]... a net negative for society.
Sure, but there are many racism-adjacent topics that are not so clear cut. For example, affirmative action is a "racist"--in the sense of discriminating based on race--policy, but there are serious, intellectual arguments made both for and against it. I put "racist" in quotes there because there's also presently a debate on the changing definition of racism: is it racist if a policy or stereotype is race-based but well-meaning and positive? Is "power" required, and does this immunize minorities from being racist? Is it racist to criticize a long-held cultural belief or practice such as circumcision?
I think all of these topics are worthy of open and honest debate. (Incidentally though, I think that the best way to shut down flat earthers and other conspiracy nuts is also through open debate...)
- GaryNumanVevo 6y agoI was referring to OP's point that there's somehow a equal place for racism and anti-racism in debate. Conversations about race are difficult because inherently racist people are like a bad faith blackhole. Also, I would love to see a single example of serious flat earther changing their mind.