3 ms·
> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323998588_Wi-Fi_is_.. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323998588_Wi-Fi_is_.... > > Wi-Fi is an important thre
by gspr 6y ago
> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323998588_Wi-Fi_is_.. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323998588_Wi-Fi_is_....
>
> Wi-Fi is an important threat to human health
Pall's methodology and understanding of EM has been critized broadly and repeatedly. Here's an "official" rebuttal to the paper you cite: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328436881_Response_to_Pall_Wi-Fi_is_an_important_threat_to_human_health https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328436881_Response_...
The rest of the papers you cite are by the same highly controversial biochemist.
At any rate, the discussion at hand is whether "EMF sensitivity" is a real condition. It patently is not. Anyone with such a condition would easily be able to collect the large monetary rewards that have been made available, and simultaneously immediately lift the social stigma they must feel. The fact that they do not speaks volumes.
- minerjoe 6y agoYea, cherry picking, me. Note that the rebuttal does not refute Pall's biomechanical thories, or say that there are no non-thermal effects, but that we need more thorough research, and that this research is not being funded. The precautionary principal (ignored in the USA, it seems), would indicate that we should be cautious and not quick to dismiss.