In article 101, "anti-competitive" is not defined as 'deciding the terms on which you will offer a service you produce and own yourself', but as an "abuse of a

In article 101, "anti-competitive" is not defined as 'deciding the terms on which you will offer a service you produce and own yourself', but as an "abuse of a dominant position" in particular: (a) directly or indirectly fix purchase or selling prices or any other trading conditions. I think the 30% IAP tax meets this condition.