2 ms·
So I'm not metallurgist but my impression is that stainless steel is used as an example because it's readily available, relatively cheap to produce and sufficie
by cletus 6y ago
So I'm not metallurgist but my impression is that stainless steel is used as an example because it's readily available, relatively cheap to produce and sufficiently effective. A number of megastructures require much greater tensile strength than that (eg space elevator). Sometimes those materials are theoretical, sometimes not and even when not, often we've yet to produce them in sufficient quantities for such a large engineering effrot.
But stainless steel cylinders? There's no in our technology to produce those (although producing them in space or on an airless world like the Moon or Mercury might be a challenge given our reliance on oxygen refining steel).
I don't know if there are any issues with having different alloys (eg carbon steel and stainless steel) in contact with each other. I know with other metals this can be an issue. But again, I'm no expert.
- TheSpiceIsLife 6y agoI’m saying I don’t believe there’s any real strength benefits from adding large amounts of chromium and nickel. 316 (marine / medics grade) stainless has a yield stength if about 600Mpa, whereas high tensile carbon steels exceed that, and adding enough chromium to make corrosion resistant stainless steel makes it a pain in the bottom to work with. You don’t need to add all that expensive chromium (11%+) to obtain high strength steels. Dissimilar metals in contact with each other are a problem because they form a battery due to moisture and solutes, thereby causing electrolysis. This would be much less of an issue in the vacuum of space.