3 ms·
Seems like this technique is not precise enough to resolve the likes of MH370? Otherwise at the rate they're going they could find the wreck soon.
by sleavey 6y ago
Seems like this technique is not precise enough to resolve the likes of MH370? Otherwise at the rate they're going they could find the wreck soon.
- Someone 6y agoEven if the stated “Seabed 2030 has a desire for a resolution of at least 100m everywhere” were correct I doubt it, but it seems to be incorrect. https://seabed2030.gebco.net/faq/#q5 https://seabed2030.gebco.net/faq/#q5: Depth range Grid cell size % of world ocean floor 0– 1500 m 100 × 100 m 13.7 1500– 3000 m 200 × 200 m 11 3000– 5750 m 400 × 400 m 72.6 5750–11000 m 800 × 800 m 2.7 MH370 could be 4000 m down, and broken apart.
- 1_player 6y agoIf, like me, you needed a refresher about flight MH370, I wholeheartedly recommend this video by LEMMiNO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kd2KEHvK-q8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kd2KEHvK-q8
- dec0dedab0de 6y agoThat was very interesting, I like that it mentioned conspiracy theories without giving them credence. I remember MH370 as the moment I realized that the ocean was wilderness. While the search was underway, my coworkers and I spent quite a bit of time guessing what could have happened. Quite a few of us assumed that the resources of the various governments involved surely would recover something fairly quickly. That is until we saw video of the Indian ocean, it was immediately clear that if they did find anything it would be luck.
- sleavey 6y agoThanks, that was great!
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]