>he minimalism point doesn't really cut it You're completely correct, but I'd go even further: if you actually understood how wired and wireless work, you'd re

>he minimalism point doesn't really cut it You're completely correct, but I'd go even further: if you actually understood how wired and wireless work, you'd realize that the wired solution was truly much more minimal: less complexity, less cost, more reliability. Wired is only more minimalist if you're looking at the wires and not thinking about the technology.