4 ms·

I was reluctant to use whatsapp and other chatting apps up until two years ago. voice notes have been really annoying for me, and for so long i have been litera

I was reluctant to use whatsapp and other chatting apps up until two years ago. voice notes have been really annoying for me, and for so long i have been literally ignoring them! Now with this corona i started to use chatting apps more regularly and at times i get really lazy to write so i will just voice note. i still struggle with them though

atoav 6y ago
As someone who grew up with things like ICQ, MSN or Skype Chat I think chats jave their place. For chitchat or conversation with friends it is very nice. For work not so much. The only time a group chat worked was on a low budget film set where I worked as a camera operator, because people only wrote something there when they needed sth.
kilroy123 6y ago
I _love_ voice messages on WhatsApp. I use them all the time. It's way better than writing out a novel to someone. Just send a quick two minute audio. Done.
- Sodman 6y ago
  The problem is that it now takes the recipient 2 minutes to listen to your message, and can't search for it when they need to reference it again in the future. If you literally just typed out the same words you spoke, the recipient can 1) interpret your message faster and 2) search for it and find it in the future. Removing those two features for marginally faster message composing just seems selfish and a waste of the recipient's time.
- atoav 6y ago
  Fast for you, slow for everybody else. You are putting the burden of making sense of what you say onto the other side. If your speech messages are concise and follow a bottom line first approach, this could be okay. After a certain length and complexity the other side will have to take notes. If you are not a clear speaker they will have to relisten and take notes. Additionally speech is usearchable which could be very bad for the other side as well — imagine someone who has to listen through 10 speech messages to figure out what you said. My girlfriend once had a manager who loved speech messages as well (I heard some of them). These messages were 15 minutes long, full of chitchat about her live and the workplace and somewhere around minute 9 the three sentences that should have been communicated to my girlfriend appeared. My girlfriend told me that she wasn't the only person who would just completely ignore these messages with the sentence if it would be important, she would send us an email. So if one is in a position where one can offload the burden of decyphering and searching for meaning in the words to others, speech messages are certainly comfortable for the sender. Sometimes they are also totally fine (e.g. to loved ones, friends, people where you know they hate reading). But in most cases you are creating work for others — work multiplied by the number of receivers and number of times they have to listen through your stuff. Imagine e.g. if you work in IT support and all you get is speech messages. That would be hell.

atoav 6y ago

As someone who grew up with things like ICQ, MSN or Skype Chat I think chats jave their place. For chitchat or conversation with friends it is very nice. For work not so much. The only time a group chat worked was on a low budget film set where I worked as a camera operator, because people only wrote something there when they needed sth.

kilroy123 6y ago

I _love_ voice messages on WhatsApp. I use them all the time. It's way better than writing out a novel to someone. Just send a quick two minute audio. Done.

Sodman 6y ago
The problem is that it now takes the recipient 2 minutes to listen to your message, and can't search for it when they need to reference it again in the future. If you literally just typed out the same words you spoke, the recipient can 1) interpret your message faster and 2) search for it and find it in the future. Removing those two features for marginally faster message composing just seems selfish and a waste of the recipient's time.
atoav 6y ago
Fast for you, slow for everybody else. You are putting the burden of making sense of what you say onto the other side. If your speech messages are concise and follow a bottom line first approach, this could be okay. After a certain length and complexity the other side will have to take notes. If you are not a clear speaker they will have to relisten and take notes. Additionally speech is usearchable which could be very bad for the other side as well — imagine someone who has to listen through 10 speech messages to figure out what you said. My girlfriend once had a manager who loved speech messages as well (I heard some of them). These messages were 15 minutes long, full of chitchat about her live and the workplace and somewhere around minute 9 the three sentences that should have been communicated to my girlfriend appeared. My girlfriend told me that she wasn't the only person who would just completely ignore these messages with the sentence if it would be important, she would send us an email. So if one is in a position where one can offload the burden of decyphering and searching for meaning in the words to others, speech messages are certainly comfortable for the sender. Sometimes they are also totally fine (e.g. to loved ones, friends, people where you know they hate reading). But in most cases you are creating work for others — work multiplied by the number of receivers and number of times they have to listen through your stuff. Imagine e.g. if you work in IT support and all you get is speech messages. That would be hell.