3 ms·
You are focusing on only one aspect of why the statues exist. There is another reason, insidious and evil, and people wish those statues to go not because of y
by philistine 6y ago
You are focusing on only one aspect of why the statues exist.
There is another reason, insidious and evil, and people wish those statues to go not because of your reason, but because of this other evil one.
Is a statue of a losing racist general erected long after the war was over as a counter against the fight for civil rights really a good way to honour soldiers?
If your statue doesn’t unequivocally reflect only one good message to all people, you’ve got a problem.
- pdonis 6y ago> If your statue doesn’t unequivocally reflect only one good message to all people, you’ve got a problem. By this logic, we should tear down all statues, since it is impossible for a statue to "unequivocally reflect only one good message to all people".
- AnimalMuppet 6y ago> If your statue doesn’t unequivocally reflect only one good message to all people, you’ve got a problem. I'm not sure that even a statue of Gandhi could meet your standard.