3 ms·
Yes, but he didn't exist in a vacuum - someone had to find his decomposing body, someone had to remove it, someone had to clean the public shelter he died in.
by EdwardDiego 6y ago
Yes, but he didn't exist in a vacuum - someone had to find his decomposing body, someone had to remove it, someone had to clean the public shelter he died in.
His chosen risks inflicted downsides on others.
- tasuki 6y ago> someone had to find his decomposing body Well, yes - is this an argument against dying in general? Fully agreed - it sucks! > someone had to remove it Yes, that's what people do with dead bodies! > someone had to clean the public shelter he died in The abandoned bus? Well no one had to clean it, but I suppose someone cleaned it? Yes, cleaning up after dead people is a nuisance. So preferably he shouldn't have died, ever? To spare the people finding his body, removing it, and cleaning up?
- EdwardDiego 6y agoThe abandoned bus that had been converted into _shelter_ for other back-country users. Shelter is vital, so not sure why you're minimising it. > Yes, that's what people do with dead bodies! Entire point is, his death was easily avoidable. He chose not to avoid it, thus impacting other people needlessly.