4 ms·
I exclusively use a wireless mouse. No latency, never have to charge it or change the batteries. I like wireless but I hope there's a better interface than Blu
by kdamica 6y ago
I exclusively use a wireless mouse. No latency, never have to charge it or change the batteries.
I like wireless but I hope there's a better interface than Bluetooth at some point.
- tuatoru 6y agoI use a wired mouse on my desktop with 1000 polls/sec and latency of about 5 ms. On my laptop (which is 9 years newer and has similar benchmark results) I use a wireless mouse which has 125 polls/sec and latency of 20 ms. Yes, one can tell the difference. It is possible to buy low-latency wireless mice. Next time, I will. Bluetooth is a trash fire. I was hoping wireless USB would take off, but that's dead now.
- buzzkillington 6y agoThe difference is the screen refresh rate. On 60Hz my wired and wireless mouse feel exactly the same. On 240Hz, yeah, there is a lot of difference.
- Fnoord 6y agoSame here. My first one was an early Naga (around 2011) which could do wired and wireless. I loved having the battery in it, so it was a bit heavier. Unfortunately it wore out. The feet got a lot of wear and tear. Later Naga were only wired, and I missed it. Now I have a Logitech G900 with a Logitech PowerPlay. So its always charged. Obviously, it has less buttons/keybinds than a Naga. On Macs, I like the Apple Magic Touchpad. It can do wired and wireless, and the battery works for ages. Any of these would also work with a magnetic cable. You'd plug it only when you'd have to charge it.