6 ms·
yeah, but they didn't get rid of the mess, they kind of made it harder for German-learners to pronounce a written word (in comparison to the post-reform federal
by wirrbel 6y ago
yeah, but they didn't get rid of the mess, they kind of made it harder for German-learners to pronounce a written word (in comparison to the post-reform federal german spelling).
i.e. "Fuß" vs swiss "Fuss"
Swiss spelling makes it appear as if "Fuss" (with a long u) could be pronounced like "Nuss" (with a short u), whereas standard German "Fuß" is clear on that.
Prior to the German spelling reform, Nuss was also written "Nuß" and back then the swiss way of spelling had the appeal of avoiding an extra character that is specific to the german language (and wasn't found on french typewriters for example).
What I meant was a spelling like "Fus, Füse, Nuss, Nüsse" but "Gras, Gräzer" (instead of Gras Gräser).
z would be the soft s-sound represented by s in traditional german spelling.
s would be the hard s sound represented by ß or s in traditional german spelling.
- majewsky 6y agoNot only that, ß is useful because it disambiguates some words that only differ in usage of ss vs. ß (and in their pronunciation), e.g. Masse (mass) != Maße (measures).
- 082349872349872 6y agoFuss is because we have both french è é à and german ü ö ä on our keyboards, so we don't have room for ß. Luckily for shell scripting, $ is unshifted (shifted would be £. I far prefer USD GBP CHF etc.) (nonante-neuf > quatre-vingt-dix-neuf. Fais-moi changer d'avis :-) )