3 ms·
At the moment, I think QUIC has a lot more benefit for many small requests, rather than for one very large streaming request. QUIC would have the advantage tha
by JoshTriplett 6y ago
At the moment, I think QUIC has a lot more benefit for many small requests, rather than for one very large streaming request.
QUIC would have the advantage that you could maintain that one stream and multiplex both video data and control information over it without the problems you'd encounter doing so on HTTP/1.1 or HTTP/2, but that definitely isn't worth the performance loss you'd get by deploying it today.
I think it makes perfect sense for you to wait for QUIC to be more heavily optimized. Once optimized, I think QUIC has the potential to be even faster, but it isn't there yet for your use case. (For that matter, some of that optimization is work you've put into optimizing existing HTTP and TCP, so it isn't surprising that your existing optimized stack beats current QUIC.)