4 ms·
> This is to say that I remember things like the original iMac with CRT display, 233MHz G3 processor, 13" screen (when people wanted 15-17" screens), and an atr
by WoodenChair 6y ago
> This is to say that I remember things like the original iMac with CRT display, 233MHz G3 processor, 13" screen (when people wanted 15-17" screens), and an atrocious mouse going against Intel machines for half the price with nearly double the speed and better specs on everything other than aesthetics. Things were really bad trying to argue that someone should spend $1,300 for an iMac when they could get a Gateway, eMachine, Acer, etc. for $600 with a 400MHz processor rather than 233MHz. A year later, Apple's at 266MHz while Intel has released the Pentium III and is cranking it up from 400MHz to 600MHz that year.
There are a lot of inaccuracies in your memories. The original iMac came out in 1998. At the time Apple’s G3 processors were very competitive with everything offered by Intel:
http://macspeedzone.com/archive/4.0/WinvsMacbytemark.html http://macspeedzone.com/archive/4.0/WinvsMacbytemark.html
And you were not getting double performance machines for half the price of the iMac. You are also incorrect about the performance situation one year later which would be 1999. Yes, that was the year the top of the line Pentium III came out at 600 MHz, but it was also the year that the top of the line Power Mac G4 came out at 500 MHz (a machine I owned after it was delayed because yields on the 500 model were poor (we were offered a 450 MHz part as a replacement)). The G4 500 was superior to the P3 600 in many benchmarks, and crushed it in others thanks to the altivec vector unit:
http://macspeedzone.com/archive/4.0/g4vspent3signal.html http://macspeedzone.com/archive/4.0/g4vspent3signal.html
I just linked to one pretty biased site here (first that came up on Google). But your extraordinary claims need some source because I don’t remember it like that at all in 1998 and 1999. PPC was a solid contender throughout the late 90s.
Also the original iMac had a 15” screen, not 13”. I had an iMac too.
- brnt 6y agoI do remember it like GP. The G4 Powermac came out in '99, and while at 500mhz it could beat a 600mhz Pentium, Intel also released an 800mhz part that year. AMD would release a 1GHz K7 within the year as well. So yeah, the G4 was perhaps winning the IPC battle, Intel and AMD were more than making up for it with higher frequencies.
- ido 6y agoThat's exactly when motorola dropped the ball (as the article mentions) - a year before they were still more or less head to head, but once amd & intel started reaching for the 1 ghz barrier they left motorola & ibm behind. Somehow the various RISC vendors managed to remain competitive for a bit longer at the top end[0] - maybe it was easier to compete at the high workstation/server/supercomputer end than at consumer hardware? [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supercomputer#/media/File:Processor_families_in_TOP500_supercomputers.svg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supercomputer#/media/File:Proc... - x86 only started dominating well into the 2000s.
- musicale 6y ago> The G4 Powermac came out in '99 "We are starting to see some great games come back to the Mac, but this is one of the coolest I've ever seen...this is the first time anybody has ever seen it, the first time they've debuted it...Halo is the name of this game, and we're going to see, for the first time: Halo." -Steve Jobs, MacWorld 1999 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6eZ2yvWl9nQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6eZ2yvWl9nQ