3 ms·
Apparently git copied the 'master' name from bitkeeper, where it was used in conjunction with 'slave' branches: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-li
by Rafert 6y ago
Apparently git copied the 'master' name from bitkeeper, where it was used in conjunction with 'slave' branches: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2019-May/msg00066.html https://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2019-May/...
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- wayneftw 6y agoThat’s not true. Follow this link to the Twitter thread where the guy (Pete Baudris) who picked the term as used in Git, explains his reasoning. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23533096 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23533096
- jmisavage 6y agoThat makes sense, but master recordings also have the concept of slave reels [1]. He probably wasn't aware of it, heck I only found out about it a few days ago [1] https://www.sweetwater.com/insync/slave-reel/ https://www.sweetwater.com/insync/slave-reel/