10 ms·
I championed the rollout of Figma at my company and what this article mentions is true: this is a tool for design, not just for designers. We initially thought
by kaelig 6y ago
I championed the rollout of Figma at my company and what this article mentions is true: this is a tool for design, not just for designers.
We initially thought we'd need to provision the same number of licenses as we did for Sketch/InVision/Abstract. Turns out way more people started to get involved in the design process and we now have a more inclusive design practice. Content strategists, UX developers, researchers, can all participate early and often. (From a revenue perspective that's a pretty convenient thing for Figma, as each editor costs $45/mo — not only are they eating market shares from the existing pie, but they are also making that pie bigger)
- dyeje 6y agoThis post encapsulates why Figma is winning, because there are thousands of teams doing this work dealing with the headaches of having design spread across multiple expensive tools. Figma just does it better.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]