2 ms·

I certainly would have preferred “an engineer that currently works with Nvidia” The way it is written currently makes it sound as though Nvidia owns this perso

• messe 6y ago
  > The way it is written currently makes it sound as though Nvidia owns this person. Not to anyone with a shred of common sense. That's a pretty common way of putting it that's far less clunky than the way you wrote it.
• miked85 6y ago
  > The way it is written currently makes it sound as though Nvidia owns this person. You can't be serious.
  • sgt 6y ago
    And now they own his home office as well!
• aspenmayer 6y ago
  Titles with character length limitations do create tension that pulls sentence construction toward concise information density over strict readability, but avoiding unintended implicit statements in titles is a concern of mine. This usage is acceptable because if you simply delete the word nvidia, we lose valuable context which tells us why we should pay attention to this post over any other engineer’s post with analogous drivers for this use case: the pedigree of the engineer suggests that the driver will be performant and of a similar quality as those other drivers produced by the engineer’s company.