3 ms·
Is it an unfashionable statement now? The vast majority of the world's programs are written in procedural languages, and that situation does not look likely to
by rsc 6y ago
Is it an unfashionable statement now?
The vast majority of the world's programs are written in procedural languages, and that situation does not look likely to change for the foreseeable future.
- dri_ft 6y agoBut fashion != popularity. Indeed, the most popular thing in a field is almost definitionally unfashionable.
- dang 6y ago(I should know better than to post ambiguous one-liners late at night.) It's certainly not an uncommon preference, but it's an unfashionable statement, at least among the intellectual circles that programming language designers with PhDs (or almost-PhDs!) tend to belong to. That's why I was interested to read it there. I've long had a joke, when asked if I prefer FP or OO, to say "I prefer imperative programming". It's funny because of that fashion. What I was wondering was whether said fashion was in place by the late 90s when dmr apparently wrote this, in which case maybe there was a trace of a joke there as well. Edit: having read more of the OP, it seems to me deliciously apropos that his dissertation involved replacing recursive logic with loops.