3 ms·
the more characters you have in your alphabet the higher the risk of pairs that are difficult to tell appart 0Oo 1l etc
by VMG 6y ago
the more characters you have in your alphabet the higher the risk of pairs that are difficult to tell appart
0Oo
1l
etc
- ryanlol 6y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base58 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base58
- VMG 6y agoBase58 has certain issues (lowercase-uppercase ambiguity) which is why we now have https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0173.mediawiki https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0173.mediawi...
- xurukefi 6y agoCan you elaborate on the ambiguity problem of Base58? I always thought that base58 was designed with this in mind as it does not include visually ambiguous letters such as "0", "O", "I", "l", etc..
- VMG 6y agoThat is true, but if somebody unfamiliar with the encoding writes down the characters or communicates them over the phone they have consider the case for every letter. That is a poor user experience.
- yiyus 6y agoNone of the two examples you showed would apply to the proposed non-numeric base 46, since 0 and 1 would not be allowed. Although it is true the potential risk may be higher, it is easy to find counterexamples where this potential risk does not matter. The 26 capital letters are easy to distinguish and allow you to use a base-26 system, while a base-2 system where the only two elements are 1 and l (or 0 and O) would be more difficult to use, for example.
- VMG 6y agoThe proposed base46 encoding has Oo Il