9 ms·
AIM – Aeronautical Information Manual
- AceyMan 6y agoIt's like the K&R of flying. Except it comes out every few years, which kind of makes it way better.
- taylorhughes 6y agoSigns & markings is one of the most enjoyable parts - also practical if you're looking out airplane windows in airports frequently! https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/aim_html/chap2_section_3.html https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/aim_html...
- tass 6y agoThe FAA publications are pretty great! PHAK is easy to read, though long: https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aviation/phak/ https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/a... Thanks for the reminder to get back to studying.
- 04rob 6y agoI've noticed there seem to be a number of pilots on HN. Anyone know of any hn-like (high quality) communities for pilots or students out there?
- synack 6y agohttps://aviation.stackexchange.com/ https://aviation.stackexchange.com/
- fuckface123 6y agolots of people on r/flying as well
- sugarkjube 6y agopprune.org is pretty big and international, also there is euroga.org in europe.
- clamprecht 6y agoNot exactly HN format, but there are some forums, to name a few: pilotsofamerica.com, and beechtalk.com (requires sign-in and real names). Many quality youtube channels, covering everything from paramotors (Tucker Gott) to backcountry flying (Trent Palmer) to an owner-flown private jet (Premier 1 Driver), to an everyday guy flying a Piper around with his family (SoCalFlyingMonkey). Another good one is Matt Guthmiller, an MIT grad who flew a Bonanza around the world when he was 19 (although he didn't get that on youtube).
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- fuckface123 6y agoAs a flight instructor, I refer to the AIM frequently. It is a good reference. The Pilot's Handbook of Aeronautical Knowledge + the Airplane Flying Handbook are what I use to teach brand new students.
- RandomBacon 6y agoYou're shadowbanned. I had to vouch for your comments here for them to appear. It is most likely due to the profanity in your username. I highly suggest creating a new account with a more family-friendly username.
- inoffensivename 6y agothanks for letting me know
- maxcan 6y agoactually, his username is the preferred FAA designation for CFIs who slow roll their students to get more hours since they are just trying to run up their 1,500 hours for an ATP. just kidding, 3/4 of the CFIs I worked with are wonderful. One was a little bit of a foxtrot foxtrot though (unrelated reasons).
- inoffensivename 6y agohah, this is true I only instruct part-time, I'm a full-time software engineer, so I'm in it for the love of flying
- maxcan 6y agoOne of my best CFIs is a Director of Hardware at a startup in the Bay, so that's music to my ears. I have an IPC coming up, if he can't make it, and you're a CFII, and in the Bay Area, I might want to look you up. Anyway to find you?
- zzless 6y ago
- RandomBacon 6y agoTangential curiousity: Does anyone here have or use the .aero TLD?
- bdenlinger 6y agoDeveloper.aero is hosted by SITA, which also uses SITA.aero
- fallingmeat 6y agowisk.aero
- nkanetka 6y agoCanadian version for those that are interested as well: https://www.tc.gc.ca/ca-publications/AIM_2020-1_E.pdf https://www.tc.gc.ca/ca-publications/AIM_2020-1_E.pdf
- __ryan__ 6y agoThe name AIM is already in use by, and widely associated with AOL instant messenger [1]. 1: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIM_(software) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIM_(software)
- repiret 6y agoThe Aeronautical Information Manual was around first. And continues to be around, unlike AOL Instant Messenger.
- wsh 6y agoThe FAA has issued the Aeronautical Information Manual under that title since 1995, and as the Airman’s Information Manual from 1967 or earlier, decades before Quantum Computer Services (AOL’s predecessor) was founded. I don’t know when ASA first published a book with “FAR/AIM” on the cover in large letters, but I suspect that this, too—a private reprinting of the AIM and selected Federal Aviation Regulations of interest to pilots—predates all things AOL.
- inamberclad 6y agoThe world doesn't revolve around software, especially in Aviation, where the protocols haven't changed a ton since the 50's.
- __ryan__ 6y agoJust teasing :)
- metanoia 6y agoIt's a bit out of date as far as some regulations go, but I am a big fan of Rod Machado's Private Pilot Handbook. Really simple but rich explanations of most of the concepts in a digestible way.
- zackbloom 6y agoFor anyone who hasn’t seen it I also recommend JO 7110, it’s the document that governs all of the behavior of Air Traffic Control. I know many pilots who had no idea they could see exactly how decisions were made on the other side of the radio: https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Order/7110.65Y_Basic_w_Chg_1_1-30-20.pdf https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Order/7110.65Y_Bas...
- metanoia 6y agoBefore 9/11 we could easily tour an ATC facility with a group of pilots - tower, center, tracon - under Project Raincheck. Not sure if they've started that back up again or not, but it was definitely eye opening. Edit: Just read the section under "Line Up And Wait" and lol'ed to myself when I saw this: "Do not authorize an aircraft to LUAW if an aircraft has been cleared to land, touch−and−go,stop−and–go, option, or unrestricted low approach on the same runway." I'm pretty sure SFO lines up aircraft on the 28's and simultaneously clears someone before the San Mateo bridge to land, while waiting for a landing aircraft to clear the runway.
- zackbloom 6y agoThey absolutely can clear someone to land while traffic is still taking off on the runway. Generally they will have the landing traffic go around if they can’t get the taking off traffic off fast enough. I believe somewhere they can also land traffic with traffic still on the runway if they have three thousand feet of clearance.