3 ms·
He withdrew a huge amount of money, in a manner that is only used by CIs and agents. From the article: > A Mountie familiar with the techniques used by the for
by function_seven 6y ago
He withdrew a huge amount of money, in a manner that is only used by CIs and agents. From the article:
> A Mountie familiar with the techniques used by the force in undercover operations, but not with the details of the investigation into the shooting, says Wortman could not have collected his own money from Brink’s as a private citizen.
and
> “When you come into my branch and you want a ton of cash, then I say, you gotta give us a couple of days. We put in our Brink’s order, I order the money through Brink’s, then when the money arrives, you come back into the branch, I bring you into a back room and I count the money out for you,” the banking expert said. “Sending someone to Brink’s to get the money? I’ve never heard of that before. The reason is, if I’m the banker, and you’ve deposited your savings in my bank branch, I’m responsible for making sure the money goes to the right person. If you want this money, I’m going to verify your identity and document that. I can’t do that if I’m transferring the money to Brink’s.”
It's solid evidence that this guy is connected to the RCMP in some manner.
- yters 6y agoan anecdote from one mountie without any reference to official procedures is solid evidence?
- 14 6y agoThe article states sources from banking confirmed this theory as well. Not just some lone RCMP.
- yters 6y agowhy would the rcmp want a random gunman to kill 20 innocent civilians? methinks the author is too quick to jump to gov conspiracy
- function_seven 6y agoI didn’t read it that way at all. All this article is alleging is that the gunman was connected with the RCMP in some fashion. Not that the RCMP actually wanted him to go on a killing spree. I’m thinking more along the lines of a confidential informant gone off the rails.
- _curious_ 6y agoSaying (err typing) "sources" does not equate to actual real life sources - no matter what the topic (or who the publisher) is. This is basic media literacy.