2 ms·
The question isn't what he should or shouldn't have done. That part is crystal clear. The question is why do people feel entitled to moral indignation on accoun
by sinker 6y ago
The question isn't what he should or shouldn't have done. That part is crystal clear. The question is why do people feel entitled to moral indignation on account of someone hiking out alone into the wilderness. The arguments so far have not been convincing - it costs money to fly them out, it puts SAR in danger.
- a-nikolaev 6y agoWe are social animals. Raising one person takes a lot of work from their parents, caregivers, teachers, friends -- "It takes a village to raise a child", proverb says. This is why just letting someone fall off the cliff (on their own will or not) is not in the interest of the society as a whole.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]