3 ms·
I'm not sure if a new particle collider is a good use of that money. But imagine you could put it towards science, innovation (like incentives for starting and
by eloff 6y ago
I'm not sure if a new particle collider is a good use of that money. But imagine you could put it towards science, innovation (like incentives for starting and running startups or businesses), and social programs (like healthcare, education).
Where would the US be after twenty years of that instead of spending it on military?
People think this idea is crazy, but if I were in charge, I'd keep a small but efficient force that can be scaled up and down quickly for dealing with Iraq or Iran scale enemies, and rely solely on nuclear weapons for defending against hostile superpowers - which is how any superpower conflict is likely to end anyway.
Yeah, you can't play the imperialism game like that, but it doesn't seem worth the cost anyway.
- DiogenesKynikos 6y agoGiven what has played out in the last 6 months, I would say a hefty chunk of money should go towards studying emerging infectious diseases, vaccine development and anti-viral drugs.
- jupp0r 6y agoClimate change, meteor strike avoidance, nuclear proliferation, ...
- DiogenesKynikos 6y agoDetecting all Near-Earth Objects larger than several meters would be pretty cheap, but it just hasn't been funded. All it takes is one small space telescope sitting at L1.