No, your analogy is wrong. It's not increasing the legal consequences for murder. What you are advocating for is loosening the description of what murder is. Th

No, your analogy is wrong. It's not increasing the legal consequences for murder. What you are advocating for is loosening the description of what murder is. That's the point. When you loosen what constitutes a "crime", then yes eventually the tables will turn on you, because those with the power will use it to the fullest they can. That's the nature of fascism. When people can no longer even ask a question or engage in a discussion and instead are outright cancelled without actually engaging in the act, then that is what "loosening a definition" is.