3 ms·
> But maybe there are strings you can attach. You could tie the debt to revenue. I think this happens often, but not often enough. You'll see "bond measures" o
by jacobr1 6y ago
> But maybe there are strings you can attach.
You could tie the debt to revenue. I think this happens often, but not often enough. You'll see "bond measures" on the ballet. "Raise sales tax by X, to pay for the bond X for purpose Z." I think this works, though you don't want to run every spending measure by the public. Maybe some of them can be more automatically applied, or within the discretion of the local council. But the key is the tie between future revenues and future expenditure.
> you should never allow debt for operating expenses or maintenance
Except these are perhaps the most important expenses. Maybe this requires something like automatic state-receivership or some other loss of local autonomy. Or the shortfall is picked up the state under some set of rules (something like state-wide municipal operational insurance, where in times of surplus everyone is kicking-in)