3 ms·

I was thinking the cheeky thing to do is charge $100,000 for the in app version. It’s technically there but even if someone clicked it almost no cc would allow

I was thinking the cheeky thing to do is charge $100,000 for the in app version. It’s technically there but even if someone clicked it almost no cc would allow the charge through.

Hamuko 6y ago
Doubt that Apple would let that pass. I Am Rich got pulled from the App Store because of its egregious pricing.
projektfu 6y ago
If apple’s store provides value they should be able to capture some at a higher price point. Charge $149 for it on the store, $99 on Android and web subscriptions. Get some of that sweet “apple tax”
- majewsky 6y ago
  AFAIK it's also against App Store policies to charge different prices in the app and outside.
  - projektfu 6y ago
    If that's the case I don't see where it's clearly stated, unless they consider that to be a "rip off". https://developer.apple.com/app-store/review/guidelines/#business https://developer.apple.com/app-store/review/guidelines/#bus...