3 ms·
They were feudal country in the fifties. That suggests being rather slow at social changes. Also, "figures show that since the early 1960s, the Tibetan popula
by trasz 6y ago
They were feudal country in the fifties. That suggests being rather slow at social changes.
Also, "figures show that since the early 1960s, the Tibetan population has been increasing, probably for the first time for centuries" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_in_Tibet https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_in_Tibet).
- ginko 6y agoMy guess is that an independent Tibet would have developed at about the same pace as neighboring Bhutan, which abolished slavery in 1958 and turned into a constitutional monarchy in 2005. There are still human rights issues in Bhutan, but it's a far cry from where they were 70 years ago.
- trasz 6y agoOkay. Is there some comparison of living conditions between modern day Bhutan and Tibet?
- ginko 6y agoI guess such comparisons are hard to make and bound to be subjective. According to [1] Bhutan's HDI was 6.17 in 2018, while according to [2] the regional HDI of Tibet was 5.85. So at the very least they're not particularly far apart from each other. [1] http://hdr.undp.org/en/countries/profiles/BTN http://hdr.undp.org/en/countries/profiles/BTN [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_administrative_divisions_of_Greater_China_by_Human_Development_Index https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_administrative_divisio...