5 ms·
- A Russian computer vision PHD did a study of the entire Apollo mission footage and prove 100% that the whole thing was made in a studio. The lights, the backg
by pipopipo2 6y ago
- A Russian computer vision PHD did a study of the entire Apollo mission footage and prove 100% that the whole thing was made in a studio. The lights, the background, everything prove this fact beyond any doubt. - The story of "oh the 400000 people involved would have spoken" is accepted by people who have never worked in a big company, or on a very big project. Everything is siloed. The number of people seeing the full picture on any endeavor is always very small. All those organisations work in a pyramid way. The one privy and understanding the truth were a very tiny group at the top and we probably don't even know their names. And let's be clear, a number of useful things came out of the people working on the Apollo mission. It was not all about the faking of course. - The story about "the Russians would have known and spoke" does not make sense when you know that at some level, they are no countries ! It well described in numerous places (books, documentaries), that the one really in power are cross border, international etc... See the footage between Medvedev and Obama some years ago. Does it seem like leaders in conflict. At some level, the earth is addressed as one. The countries are artificial constructs. Yes they are wars, they are races for technology etc.... but there exist a level where those things are just part of the divide and conquer, as well as distract from real truths. So some Russians probably knew but would not make any sense to end the phony countries war/conflict. Just think that Eisenhower daughter married a Russian astronauts, and that Werner Von Braun was an ex Nazi. Why isn't this more widely mentioned ? Does it make sense in a context of countries really fighting each other ? - There is this push recently for saying "oh it would have been more simple to really go there than to fake it". How can someone be so brainwashed and stupid to end up with some argument. This people saying that probably do not have kids born in the internet age with mobiles, and flat screen at home etc... Try to explain them we went to the moon 50 years ago before all of that....And don't tell me about the little robot on the surface of Mars, the Moon, or whatever.... - The deflector story is laughable. Do some research to what the official claim about that is. It's a shocker. Basically the laser signal is supposed to be so faint when back from the moon that they could be picking any random signals and make it appear as the ray of light back from the mirror. It's really an abuse of weakness and ignorance. In his response Armstrong is here typically looking down on the whole fooled population when throwing this argument. Sorry if it's that hard to really accept the whole thing was phony but we really need to grow and move beyond accepting the lies and stop calling names people who did their own search and know what's real. You can be educated, knowledgeable, have a sort of normal life and still fully be aware that no we did not sent military agent hundreds miles away in a rocket to play golf !! no we did not do that and I also doubt Elon Musk sent a Tesla car in space. We have urgent important real problems to tackle and should put all this space distraction to rest for now. We should be considering space once we have managed to really have a full understanding of what is really happening on the ground around us.
- DrScump 6y agoPeople, just look at modern LRO imagery of the six Apollo landing sites. And try to explain the laser reflectors we use to measure distance to this day?
- blaser-waffle 6y agoA 6 hour old account spouting off about how moon landings were faked. Low effort, IMO. The serious trolls and professional shills have accounts that are years old and have longer post histories.
- pipopipo2 6y agospouting ? those are facts... ycombinator is testing the level of awareness from its community that's it. But the case has been closed long ago with an overwhelming amount of scientific evidence backed by real proven sound facts ! Sorry if it is hard to accept. Example: https://www.aulis.com/raytracing_as11.htm https://www.aulis.com/raytracing_as11.htm