> an argument that I love: Microservices and microfrontends are (most of the time) a failure of encapsulation [1] There are plenty of problems and challenges

> an argument that I love: Microservices and microfrontends are (most of the time) a failure of encapsulation [1] There are plenty of problems and challenges with microservices, but that rant makes no sense at all. The blogger does not understand the upside of running separate processes? And then although he presents himself totally oblivious to the problem somehow asserts that "programming languages give us all we need to encapsulate state and environment", claiming that any shortcoming is due to people doing it wrong? Quite frankly, that article is just a rant devoid of any rational point, and it surprised me how it has been presented as some sort of argument on an entire architecture style.