3 ms·

There are always people that actually believe it, but there are good reasons to suspect it's not entirely organic. If one made a list of times the "fake landing

• surfpel 6y ago
  > The most effective way to prevent people from looking into something is to poison the well. Attach the thing to something else obviously false, bonus points if evokes a negative emotional response. But then what is the end goal of all this? Anti-US propaganda?
  • jakeogh 6y ago
    To cause the desired effect. It's the most effective technique to stop people from looking at something. Consider why this purely technical, on-topic and perfectly NIST sourced comment was flagged: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23419760 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23419760 screenshot: http://v6y.net/1592547475.screenshot.png http://v6y.net/1592547475.screenshot.png
    • malft 6y ago
      I assume it was flagged because unless you're already a true believer, "look! this falling building is falling according to the laws of physics" is not a very strong argument.
      • jakeogh 6y ago
        "Study finds political bias skews perceptions of verifiable fact" 7 @ g for 2.25s is a verifiable fact from one of the most prestigious standards making bodies on the planet. There are tutorials on reproducing that NIST measurement. You seem to be not surprised it's flagged, and you bring up belief. Why? Believer of what? Argument of what?