4 ms·
But the title is "worst year to be alive", so while the contrast of 536 was likely the biggest, measured objectively by food availability, life expectancy etc 5
by 9nGQluzmnq3M 6y ago
But the title is "worst year to be alive", so while the contrast of 536 was likely the biggest, measured objectively by food availability, life expectancy etc 543 was the worst.
- TrainedMonkey 6y agoObjectively you are right, subjectively that statement is technically correct and that is worst kind of correct :)