2 ms·
Thanks for the kind words. We're working on it. 1a) (as you noted) should be in the next release 1b) working on it, should be in the next release: https://git
by vvern 6y ago
Thanks for the kind words. We're working on it.
1a) (as you noted) should be in the next release
1b) working on it, should be in the next release: https://github.com/cockroachdb/cockroach/pull/50320 https://github.com/cockroachdb/cockroach/pull/50320
1c) I filed https://github.com/cockroachdb/cockroach/issues/50418 https://github.com/cockroachdb/cockroach/issues/50418 to track. It seems plausible that we could fit in a story here with the work we're doing to expose MVCC timestamps to SQL.
1d) No plans on any sort of text search story but geo is underway (see https://github.com/cockroachdb/cockroach/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3AA-geospatial https://github.com/cockroachdb/cockroach/issues?q=is%3Aissue...)
Curious to hear about your use of full text search in postgres.
Have you ever used pgtrgm? Would something like that or compatible with that be interesting to you? https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/pgtrgm.html https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/pgtrgm.html
For "even their enterprise backup capabilities are poor." are there specific things you have in mind?
- latch 6y agoYes, pgtrgm is what we used. Right now, we're using it for indexing very small data, e.g. filtering users by name/email/phone. Our solution is to store our own ngram-ish stuff into a _search table. Given a user: id: 1 name: Leto Atreides email: leto@calagan.gov user_search (user_id, search, score): 1, let, 10 1, atr, 10 1, leto, 600 1, atreides, 500 1, leto atreides, 1000 1, leto@caladan.gov, 100 1, caladan, 10 And join via: select user_id, sum(score) score from user_search where search like 'let%' group by user_id order by score desc For backups... 1. It looks like 20.1 addressed 2 limitation I saw with enterprise: point in time restores and encryption. My mistake for not staying up to date. 2. When I look at PG's replication capabilities, which enables tools like barman, stand-by servers (via delayed replicas) and read-only replicas, I feel like PG is way ahead. I know this isn't strictly "backups", but to me it's all foundation that enables robust disaster recovery. What I would like to see is: 1. community edition with a 100% working (there are edge cases now where it can fail) full + incremental backup + reasonable restore capabilities (restore of a full backups is slow enough now to undermine any serious DR plans) 2. enterprise edition adds: a- encryption b- configurable storage (s3, gc, ...) c- delayed stand-by server d- more configuration (# of full backups to keep, number of days to keep, etc etc (e.g, everything barman offers, but point e:) e- 100% managed in web, including being able to do PITR to a separate server/cluster, and verifying DB integrity While I have you here, my dream list (I know these are all known issues) 1 - Can't defer referential integrity check 2 - Can't index arrays 3 - No enums 4 - No ranges 5 - No triggers (i imagine this would be a big one) And, I really wish that start-single-node with a mem store would be faster (for our integration tests).
- rohany 6y agoEnums should be coming in 20.2 as well :)
- jordanthoms 6y agoI'm going to be evaluating CRDB (Enterprise version) for us next week - we also use pgtrgm with GIN as a really convenient way of making some simple searches like "SELECT * FROM users WHERE name LIKE '%bob%'" not need a full table scan. So would be very interested in that being added.
- vvern 6y agoCool, pgtrgm has come up a few times in recent weeks. It's tracked in the below issue. I'm interested in hacking on it as it seems like a big reward for not that much work. https://github.com/cockroachdb/cockroach/issues/41285 https://github.com/cockroachdb/cockroach/issues/41285