3 ms·

The experiment necessary would need create a large enough society that adopts a very low EMF exposure lifestyle from pre-birth. There certainly appears to be en

by loceng 6y ago

The experiment necessary would need create a large enough society that adopts a very low EMF exposure lifestyle from pre-birth. There certainly appears to be enough evidence to suggest some people are more sensitive to others to energy, and perhaps that has to do with natural sensitivity levels, either the "fragility" or "strength" of the characteristic's of someone's brain's neural network - more "strength" with redundancy, or more "fragility" with less redundancy, with pros-cons for each. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15789758/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15789758/ - exposure to "extremely LOW" EMFs in rats caused them hyperalgesia (hypersensitivity to pain) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4946261/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4946261/ https://www.who.int/peh-emf/publications/facts/fs296/en/ https://www.who.int/peh-emf/publications/facts/fs296/en/

Someone 6y ago
“https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15789758/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15789758/ - exposure to "extremely LOW" EMFs in rats caused them hyperalgesia” Extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields. I can’t find what field strength they used from the abstract, and that may not matter much, as radio isn’t extremely low frequency, and newer technology tends to be higher frequency because that increases bandwidth. That article is more about the 50Hz/60Hz of AC electricity than about radio communication waves. Also, your WHO link says “A number of studies have been conducted where EHS individuals were exposed to EMF similar to those that they attributed to the cause of their symptoms. The aim was to elicit symptoms under controlled laboratory conditions. The majority of studies indicate that EHS individuals cannot detect EMF exposure any more accurately than non-EHS individuals. Well controlled and conducted double-blind studies have shown that symptoms were not correlated with EMF exposure. It has been suggested that symptoms experienced by some EHS individuals might arise from environmental factors unrelated to EMF. Examples may include “flicker” from fluorescent lights, glare and other visual problems with VDUs, and poor ergonomic design of computer workstations. Other factors that may play a role include poor indoor air quality or stress in the workplace or living environment. There are also some indications that these symptoms may be due to pre-existing psychiatric conditions as well as stress reactions as a result of worrying about EMF health effects, rather than the EMF exposure itself”
- loceng 6y ago
  Sure, you just cherry picked parts to support the opposing side or doubt. Clearly it needs more study and better defined, controlled studies at that. We know there are animals that are capable of feeling, detecting magnetic fields, including the subtlety of the Earth's magnetic field. That all or some humans may have this capability, and at different sensitivity levels/awareness levels, arguably isn't a farfetched idea.

by loceng 6y ago

Someone 6y ago

“https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15789758/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15789758/ - exposure to "extremely LOW" EMFs in rats caused them hyperalgesia” Extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields. I can’t find what field strength they used from the abstract, and that may not matter much, as radio isn’t extremely low frequency, and newer technology tends to be higher frequency because that increases bandwidth. That article is more about the 50Hz/60Hz of AC electricity than about radio communication waves. Also, your WHO link says “A number of studies have been conducted where EHS individuals were exposed to EMF similar to those that they attributed to the cause of their symptoms. The aim was to elicit symptoms under controlled laboratory conditions. The majority of studies indicate that EHS individuals cannot detect EMF exposure any more accurately than non-EHS individuals. Well controlled and conducted double-blind studies have shown that symptoms were not correlated with EMF exposure. It has been suggested that symptoms experienced by some EHS individuals might arise from environmental factors unrelated to EMF. Examples may include “flicker” from fluorescent lights, glare and other visual problems with VDUs, and poor ergonomic design of computer workstations. Other factors that may play a role include poor indoor air quality or stress in the workplace or living environment. There are also some indications that these symptoms may be due to pre-existing psychiatric conditions as well as stress reactions as a result of worrying about EMF health effects, rather than the EMF exposure itself”

loceng 6y ago
Sure, you just cherry picked parts to support the opposing side or doubt. Clearly it needs more study and better defined, controlled studies at that. We know there are animals that are capable of feeling, detecting magnetic fields, including the subtlety of the Earth's magnetic field. That all or some humans may have this capability, and at different sensitivity levels/awareness levels, arguably isn't a farfetched idea.