I think the argument is that the landing was broadcast televised (streamed, not filmed). The linked video seems to compare the "instant replay" drive (rather t

I think the argument is that the landing was broadcast televised (streamed, not filmed). The linked video seems to compare the "instant replay" drive (rather than a traditional film camera) for the orders of magnitude. The similar comparison of film-to-film seems to have ore to do with splicing and the switchover from one reel to another. Anyway you look at it, conspiracy theorists will always say "they had 2% of US GDP for a decade... they could have invented any number of technologies to assist with the filming".