3 ms·
> than was possible by several orders of magnitude. Nitpicking here, but it clearly couldn't have been by "several orders of magnitude" since they were using t
by SahAssar 6y ago
> than was possible by several orders of magnitude.
Nitpicking here, but it clearly couldn't have been by "several orders of magnitude" since they were using tape that was 1/4th of that for the actual recording.
- thephyber 6y agoI think the argument is that the landing was broadcast televised (streamed, not filmed). The linked video seems to compare the "instant replay" drive (rather than a traditional film camera) for the orders of magnitude. The similar comparison of film-to-film seems to have ore to do with splicing and the switchover from one reel to another. Anyway you look at it, conspiracy theorists will always say "they had 2% of US GDP for a decade... they could have invented any number of technologies to assist with the filming".
- danpalmer 6y agoThey could record the live broadcast from the moon on to multiple reels, but they couldn't replay from multiple. They would have needed a lot of tape, but not one continuous play.