27 ms·
Rada has voted in favor of revoking it in 2014: https://iportal.rada.gov.ua/ru/news/Novosty/Soobshchenyya/88116.html https://iportal.rada.gov.ua/ru/news/Novosty
by fuoqi 6y ago
Rada has voted in favor of revoking it in 2014: https://iportal.rada.gov.ua/ru/news/Novosty/Soobshchenyya/88116.html https://iportal.rada.gov.ua/ru/news/Novosty/Soobshchenyya/88...
It's exactly the same day when active protests in Crimea and Donbas have started. Yes, technically the law was still active, but it was just a delay due to the powerful backlash and people understood well intention of those who came into power.
>Sounds reasonable to me.
Wow... I guess let's agree to disagree here. Because for me a situation in which 80% people speak a language in daily life, but it's not an official one, looks more suitable for an occupation, than for a normal state. Can you name any other world country with a similar situation? (IIRC only Baltic states come somewhat close)
And let's be honest, "regional language status" was just breadcrumbs. Russian was systematically discriminated as a matter of state policy starting from TV and ending with schools, with situation only worsening over time.
>Window of opportunity was caused by messed up government in Ukraine, which couldn't produce any resistance against Russia's military invasion.
Don't forget about heavily demoralized military (and the protests have played a major part here), which didn't believe in the new government, and most of which accepted Russian terms and got integrated into its military. Also some say that the new government has intentionally allowed the situation around Crimea and Donbas to degrade, so a lot of pro-Russian electorate would be cut off from elections. But I guess gross incompetence is usually a better explanation.
- riku_iki 6y ago> Yes, technically the law was still active, but it was just a delay due to the powerful backlash and people understood well intention of those who came into power. Pure speculation. > in which 80% people speak a language in daily life, Citation needed. > Don't forget about heavily demoralized military (and the protests have played a major part here), which didn't believe in the new government, and most of which accepted Russian terms and got integrated into its military. Pure speculation.
- sobani 6y ago> > in which 80% people speak a language in daily life, > Citation needed. According to Wikipedia, in May 2013 82% of respondents spoke Russian at home. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Crimea#Ethnicities_and_languages https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Crimea#Ethnici...
- riku_iki 6y agoCorrect, and Russian was official in Crimea, but I was thinking previous commenter was talking about whole country, maybe I got confused.
- drran 6y ago> Rada has voted in favor of revoking it in 2014 Revoking of what? Russian language is protected by Constitution of Ukraine, as language of minority. Did you read what you posted? > looks more suitable for an occupation, than for a normal state. You are right, Crimea was occupied by Russian Empire and USSR. Natives (Tatars, Goths, Greeks, Italians, Turks, Ukrainians) are exhaled or exterminated. > Don't forget about heavily demoralized military (and the protests have played a major part here) Russian propaganda, in Russian language, played major role. Russian Federation planned to attack Ukraine since 2008, preparing for occupation of Crimea and creation of "Newrussia". As former officer of intelligence, I knew about planned protests controlled by RF (AKA "Шатун") in 2012.