4 ms·
This seems to be one developer's wishful thinking, without any evidence presented to back up the assertion. Pointing out "hey, here's a couple websites that do
by stickfigure 6y ago
This seems to be one developer's wishful thinking, without any evidence presented to back up the assertion. Pointing out "hey, here's a couple websites that do server side rendering" does not a trend make.
We're ripping out webflow, if anecdata counts for anything (it doesn't). Webflow occupies the barren middle ground of "too complicated for marketing people, too simple for technical people". I find it much easier to write html than to figure out how to get their UI to make the html I want.
- djohnston 6y agoI just hit the same wall with bubble.. it definitely has some impressive attributes but sometimes I just need to see the code. I really hate clicking around looking for descendent nodes in a UI vs just looking at html template
- petepete 6y agoGOV.UK is a good example of a mainstream site that's built in the traditional manner. It's actually a collection of hundreds (thousands) of separate services, the vast majority of which are rendered on the server and use JS only where necessary. As there's no advertising or images on most pages they tend to be incredibly fast too.