3 ms·

Depends on what was posted obviously. If I'm just removing opinions I disagree with its obvious I'm exercising full control over the content and therefore assu

Depends on what was posted obviously. If I'm just removing opinions I disagree with its obvious I'm exercising full control over the content and therefore assume full liability. Can't have one without the other.

duxup 6y ago
Wouldn't your premise mean that at some scale you can't actually operate? It's not really possible to operate and actually be liable all content on facebook, or youtube, or etc right?
- liaukovv 6y ago
  Maybe you can't, maybe you should have thought of that before assuming this liability. But for society at large good faith attempt at following your own rules would suffice probably.
  - duxup 6y ago
    I don't think communication should be restricted because of scale of moderation issues. That seems artificial and strange.
    - liaukovv 6y ago
      We agree here, I also don't think that communication should restricted because twitter is based in california.
      - duxup 6y ago
        Do you mean if you do touch any of the content, you must touch it all? Or if at scale you have to shutdown or something? This path seems unworkable.
        liaukovv 6y ago
        If you become too touch-happy maybe you are editing more than you are moderating. And if you edit more that you moderate maybe you don't deserve moderation protections.
        duxup 6y ago
        How do you determine any of this? Who gets to decide?
gamblor956 6y ago
By that argument, if you fail to remove a comment from your post because you were on vacation, that means you accept full liability for that comment...even if that comment was inciting murder and someone acted on it. That sort of silly black and white logic doesn't work in the real world.