3 ms·
Agreed and appreciate the feedback. Today is our official launch, we have a long way to go. I'm not happy with the state of our data. We had the trade-off conv
by r3trohack3r 6y ago
Agreed and appreciate the feedback. Today is our official launch, we have a long way to go.
I'm not happy with the state of our data. We had the trade-off conversation about waiting to ship until we felt it "complete" and shipping now to get feedback and spread the message.
We have a bet that we aren't the only ones who are disturbed by what our mission addresses. We wanted to condense our mission down into an articulation of our take on the problem domain and try to spread it. This articulation is meant to cut to the core of the problems in an easy to follow way. Today is part litmus test of our mission and part litmus test of our articulation.
I've updated the homepage with our current strategy. But this is early and we are looking for help in cultivating that strategy.
- yummypaint 6y agoAnother thing that came to mind: typically i think of the EFF as being front and center in many of these fights. Even if you don't mention them by name, it might be good to communicate if you have capabilities they don't that can be complimentary.
- schoen 6y agoNote that EFF is a 501(c)(3) and can't support or oppose candidates in elections.
- pmiller2 6y agoI have to say, right now, it looks like some kind of parody site. Every single senator and representative has 3 red X's next to them, and there's nothing to represent any of their opponents, or any third party candidates. I think I would have left that part off entirely at this point, since those pages have effectively zero information content. OTOH, https://everytwoyears.org/mission.html https://everytwoyears.org/mission.html is great.
- r3trohack3r 6y agoYou're right. They were placeholders that showed future intent. I shouldn't put my TODO list on the website. I'm taking it down now. I appreciate your feedback.