4 ms·
Ok, suppose for a minute this is true. Imagine you're in charge of making campaign ads for the Trump. You google image search "antifa logo" and see a sea of st
by AlexandrB 6y ago
Ok, suppose for a minute this is true.
Imagine you're in charge of making campaign ads for the Trump. You google image search "antifa logo" and see a sea of stuff that looks like two flags in a circle. ...but instead you choose some obscure symbol that's not in the first page of results?? I mean that really strains credulity. Like, it's definitely possible, but Occam's razor is working hard against you.
- jeffdavis 6y agoI was just trying to follow the evidence presented to see if it supported the argument made, and I was unsuccessful. I am not saying the argument is false, I am just trying to follow the logical chain and I had a question about it. Aside: am I the only one who thinks web links to twitter are hard to follow? Even the basics of who is saying what, about what, to whom? Usually I can't even tell what side of the argument someone is on when they are saying something, or whether an image or quote is something they are replying to or using as evidence to support their new claims.
- at_a_remove 6y agoFunny, I had always associated the three arrows pointing at a downward slant with them.
- anigbrowl 6y agoThat is the logo of the 'iron front' and is quite popular among Antifa supporters in the US, though not in Europe so much.
- mercer 6y agoI also found the whole 14 words, 88 ads to be somewhat suspicious. I try to be careful about my pattern matching, so when it comes to that I'm open to the idea that it wasn't intentional. But taken together it does seem rather too coincidental.