3 ms·
You may want to add stuff like this to the site, if you expect donations. Being open and transparent about donations and where the money is going etc would als
by whycombagator 6y ago
You may want to add stuff like this to the site, if you expect donations.
Being open and transparent about donations and where the money is going etc would also go a long way. So would open sourcing all the analysis etc.
- r3trohack3r 6y agoThanks <3 Agreed. We are open source from day one: https://github.com/every-two-years https://github.com/every-two-years. The only piece that isn't open source at the moment is our donations page and I'm working to fix that. We don't have any formal analysis yet, being a bit more transparent about why everyone has an X right now (it's the default) might help too?
- whycombagator 6y ago> being a bit more transparent about why everyone has an X right now (it's the default) might help too? I think that would be helpful. Also maybe add a sort functionality for the data. Just a simple asc/desc. Scrolling the entire House to see if there was anything but a red X was tiring :) Edit: adding a link to Github on the site would be a good idea too IMO.
- r3trohack3r 6y agoThank you for engaging so much <3 I've dropped the Senate and House pages from our website for now until we have concrete data. Once we start building out our analysis, it will be transparent and open. I've added a link to our GitHub organization in the footer of the website under "Open By Design".
- r3trohack3r 6y agoI added it to the faq page, thank you for the feedback! https://everytwoyears.org/faq.html https://everytwoyears.org/faq.html