3 ms·
My websites are behind Cloudflare. If not Cloudflare then I'd use another CDN. Therefore I don't have logs. Also I disagree about the slowness. The script is
by bad_user 6y ago
My websites are behind Cloudflare. If not Cloudflare then I'd use another CDN. Therefore I don't have logs.
Also I disagree about the slowness.
The script is loaded asynchrously, it does not block the page and I measure my loading times, which are really good actually. Just did a measurement and my front-page loads in 271 ms and this includes all network requests, including Matomo.
I don't think this is a real concern, but rather a premature optimization. If GoAccess works for you, great, but that's not something I can use due to CDN.
- chrismorgan 6y agoThe painfully slow interface I’m speaking of is Matomo’s app, the part you as the site administrator look at; not piwik.js or whatever they call it now. But since you’ve raised the script part, 50KB of JS loaded from a new host is perhaps surprisingly much work, especially on slower devices. I find the difference between running no JavaScript at all and running Matomo’s client script, even asynchronously, to be easily visible.
- markdown 6y ago> Just did a measurement and my front-page loads in 271 ms and this includes all network requests Is your audience just the people in your locality, or the entire world?
- bad_user 6y agoThe test wasn't local.