3 ms·

I can see how it could be read that way, but are content providers really buried in litigation in practice? I actually don't have much insight here personally,

by ch4s3 6y ago

I can see how it could be read that way, but are content providers really buried in litigation in practice? I actually don't have much insight here personally, so I'm quite curious.

Nasrudith 6y ago
No because have section 230 protections in the first place. They can arbitrarily start playing Mao and banning people for arbitrady undisclosed reasons and it would be legal. That is a major Chesterton's fence.