I can't read his comment as anything but him agreeing with parent, i.e. labeling the parent's quoted text as ROT. I think we're so used to point->counter->poin

I can't read his comment as anything but him agreeing with parent, i.e. labeling the parent's quoted text as ROT. I think we're so used to point->counter->point->counter nested trees that we pattern match disagreement even when it's not there.