5 ms·
How is that related? Are you justifying violence?
by qbaqbaqba 6y ago
How is that related? Are you justifying violence?
- knolax 6y agoContext for why someone would want to burn a police car?
- lostmsu 6y agoThat event happened 35 years ago.
- st1ck 6y agoyet > no one from the city government has been criminally charged for the attack
- lostmsu 6y agoEven that was in 2005. Any charges have expiration, and once exonerated can not be brought up again. Much changes over 15 years.
- kerkeslager 6y agoThere isn't a statute of limitations on murder in PA.
- knolax 6y agoThe front page has an article about a processor from 42 years ago. What's your point?
- lostmsu 6y agoThat you can't estimate how current processors will match your expectations based on how 42 years ago processor matched expectations of people living at the time.
- knolax 6y agoIf 42 years ago Intel sold a processor that burned my house down, I might not be the biggest fan of Intel even 42 years later. This isn't about expectations, it's about reputation. Not everyone has a goldfish memory.
- lostmsu 6y agoMacBooks and Samsung phones had fire problems just a few years ago. So you seem to be wrong.
- antihero 6y agoJust saying, certain people are very very happy to point out the violence of the oppressed, yet throw a hissy fit when people point out the violence of the oppressor.
- qbaqbaqba 6y agoJustifying is not pointing out.
- d2v 6y agoNo, just trying to highlight the double standard when it comes to how law enforcement are treated compared to everyone else. I also wouldn't classify destroying the car of a government organization as violence. It's destruction, but fairly mild compared to burning people's homes to the ground. And even then, I wouldn't think to compare property damage to actual violence, like murder.
- non-entity 6y agoTo note another interesting double standard, its interesting how different people view say, the Waco situation than this.