This presents itself as a treatise, but it very much is not. It totally ignores critical aspects that should influence monitor choice. In decreasing importanc

This presents itself as a treatise, but it very much is not. It totally ignores critical aspects that should influence monitor choice. In decreasing importance (imo): - cost - contrast ratio / black level - all aspects related to temporal feel that aren’t refresh rate (response/decay time, sample and hold, backlight strobing, etc.) - color gamut - color precision (nobody wants banding from 6 bpc + FRC) You can’t honestly make recommendations to people for $1000 monitors without even addressing these points, even if you don’t think they’re important for your workflow. It is very poor form.